Go to footer

[SOLVED] New Prefix




Discuss missing features and find out whether they make sense in JT65-HF.

[SOLVED] New Prefix

Postby TI4/N0URE » Sat 20. Apr 2013, 05:45

New additional Prefixes has been a problem for a long time. If you review the thread "Request New Prefix" in the Google JT65-HF forum you can read the old history. Many of us are Required by regulation to use a prefix.
My request has been standing for a number of years. I hope you will be able to address the Prefix problem.

John TI4/N0URE
TI4/N0URE
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat 20. Apr 2013, 05:36


by Advertising » Sat 20. Apr 2013, 05:45

Advertising
 


Re: New Prefix

Postby dl4oce » Mon 6. May 2013, 07:59

I don't think this will fit the 13 symbols limit of JT65. But could you please contact the JT65 Google group?

In case it's possible by technical meanings, I'd put it on the list.
dl4oce
Administrator
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri 8. Mar 2013, 07:11


Re: New Prefix

Postby dl4oce » Wed 22. Jan 2014, 18:25

It's simply not possible with the JT65A protocol.
dl4oce
Administrator
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri 8. Mar 2013, 07:11


Return to Board index

Return to Feature Requests

Who is online

No registered users





Bei iphpbb3.com bekommen Sie ein kostenloses Forum mit vielen tollen Extras
Forum kostenlos einrichten - Hot Topics - Tags
Beliebteste Themen: Essen, Programm

Impressum | Datenschutz